↓ Skip to main content

Does relative remoteness affect chronic disease outcomes? Geographic variation in chronic disease mortality in Australia, 2002–2006

Overview of attention for article published in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does relative remoteness affect chronic disease outcomes? Geographic variation in chronic disease mortality in Australia, 2002–2006
Published in
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, April 2014
DOI 10.1111/1753-6405.12126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramakrishna Chondur, Shu Qin Li, Steven Guthridge, Paul Lawton

Abstract

To examine the variation of chronic disease mortality by remoteness areas of Australia, including states and territories.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 38%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 13 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2015.
All research outputs
#5,188,039
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#754
of 1,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,223
of 239,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.