↓ Skip to main content

What’s Wrong with the Tap? Examining Perceptions of Tap Water and Bottled Water at Purdue University

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 1,935)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
8 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
Title
What’s Wrong with the Tap? Examining Perceptions of Tap Water and Bottled Water at Purdue University
Published in
Environmental Management, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00267-011-9692-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amber Saylor, Linda Stalker Prokopy, Shannon Amberg

Abstract

The environmental impacts of bottled water prompted us to explore drinking water choices at Purdue University, located in West Lafayette, IN. A random sample of 2,045 Purdue University students, staff, and faculty was invited to participate in an online survey. The survey assessed current behaviors as well as perceived barriers and benefits to drinking tap water versus bottled water. 677 surveys were completed for a response rate of 33.1%. We then conducted qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of university undergraduates (n = 21) to obtain contextual insights into the survey results and the beliefs of individuals with a variety of drinking water preferences. This study revealed that women drink disproportionately more bottled water then men while undergraduate students drink more than graduate students, staff and faculty. The study also uncovered a widespread belief that recycling eliminates the environmental impacts of bottled water. Important barriers to drinking tap water at Purdue include: perceived risks from tap water and the perceived safety of bottled water, preferring the taste of bottled water, and the convenience of drinking bottled water. The qualitative interviews revealed that drinking water choices can be influenced by several factors-especially whether individuals trust tap water to be clean-but involve varying levels of complexity. The implications of these results for social marketing strategies to promote tap water are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 272 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 18%
Student > Bachelor 45 16%
Researcher 32 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 9%
Professor 13 5%
Other 51 18%
Unknown 64 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 51 18%
Social Sciences 28 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 5%
Other 71 25%
Unknown 74 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#609,343
of 25,651,057 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#27
of 1,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,078
of 123,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,651,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.