You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is reconstruction the best management strategy for anterior cruciate ligament rupture? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus non-operative treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Knee, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.knee.2013.10.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T.O. Smith, K. Postle, F. Penny, I. McNamara, C.J.V. Mann |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal clinical and cost-effective strategy for managing people following ACL rupture. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| Ireland | 2 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Singapore | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 70% |
| Scientists | 6 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 530 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 524 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 95 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 77 | 15% |
| Other | 38 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 38 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 111 | 21% |
| Unknown | 138 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 181 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 91 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 37 | 7% |
| Engineering | 10 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 7% |
| Unknown | 165 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,303,284
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Knee
#25
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,902
of 224,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.