↓ Skip to main content

Sociosexuality in Women and Preference for Facial Masculinization and Somatotype in Men

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Sociosexuality in Women and Preference for Facial Masculinization and Somatotype in Men
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, June 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10508-006-9029-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meghan P. Provost, Christine Kormos, Graham Kosakoski, Vernon L. Quinsey

Abstract

Sociosexual orientation reflects individual differences in openness to short-term sexual relationships. We predicted that women with less restricted sociosexuality would be differentially attracted to highly masculinized male faces and bodies. In 2 studies, we investigated preference for male masculinization as a function of female sociosexuality. In Study 1, 40 female university students rated the attractiveness of pictures of male faces and somatotypes differing in masculinization level. All women preferred the faces with average levels of masculinity and the mesomorph somatotype; however, women with less restricted sociosexuality found the faces of men more attractive in general and showed relatively greater preference for masculinized bodies than did women with more restricted sociosexuality. In Study 2, 56 women met with 2 equally attractive male confederates, 1 highly masculinized and 1 less masculinized, in a "speed dating" scenario. After each date, women indicated their interest in each man for short-term and long-term relationships via questionnaire. In this more naturalistic context, sociosexuality was related to an increased interest for the more highly masculinized man in the context of short-term dating. Female sociosexuality appears to be related to preferences for higher levels of male masculinization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 3 5%
Czechia 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Netherlands 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Croatia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 51 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Master 10 16%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Other 5 8%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 59%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 8 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2020.
All research outputs
#13,162,991
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,568
of 3,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,154
of 63,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.