↓ Skip to main content

The impact of prophylactic intravenous lidocaine on opioid-induced cough: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Anesthesia, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
The impact of prophylactic intravenous lidocaine on opioid-induced cough: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00540-013-1732-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liang Sun, Rui Guo, Li Sun

Abstract

Opioids are commonly used for general anesthesia, but reflex cough can occur after an intravenous injection. We have performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic lidocaine administered intravenously (IV) on opioid-induced cough (OIC) during induction in patients undergoing general anesthesia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 12 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 15 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2014.
All research outputs
#20,209,145
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#682
of 805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,549
of 213,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#21
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 805 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.