| Title |
Interrelationship of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus colonization within and between pneumococcal-vaccine naïve mother-child dyads
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-13-483 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tinevimbo Shiri, Marta C Nunes, Peter V Adrian, Nadia Van Niekerk, Keith P Klugman, Shabir A Madhi |
| Abstract |
A high prevalence of bacterial nasopharyngeal co-infections has been reported in children, however, such data is limited in adults. We examined the interaction of Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae pharyngeal colonization in mother-child dyads. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 23% |
| Researcher | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 30% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2015.
All research outputs
#14,765,501
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,057
of 7,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,089
of 211,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#68
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.