↓ Skip to main content

Neural evidence for predictive coding in auditory cortex during speech production

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Neural evidence for predictive coding in auditory cortex during speech production
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, April 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13423-017-1284-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kayoko Okada, William Matchin, Gregory Hickok

Abstract

Recent models of speech production suggest that motor commands generate forward predictions of the auditory consequences of those commands, that these forward predications can be used to monitor and correct speech output, and that this system is hierarchically organized (Hickok, Houde, & Rong, Neuron, 69(3), 407--422, 2011; Pickering & Garrod, Behavior and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329--347, 2013). Recent psycholinguistic research has shown that internally generated speech (i.e., imagined speech) produces different types of errors than does overt speech (Oppenheim & Dell, Cognition, 106(1), 528--537, 2008; Oppenheim & Dell, Memory & Cognition, 38(8), 1147-1160, 2010). These studies suggest that articulated speech might involve predictive coding at additional levels than imagined speech. The current fMRI experiment investigates neural evidence of predictive coding in speech production. Twenty-four participants from UC Irvine were recruited for the study. Participants were scanned while they were visually presented with a sequence of words that they reproduced in sync with a visual metronome. On each trial, they were cued to either silently articulate the sequence or to imagine the sequence without overt articulation. As expected, silent articulation and imagined speech both engaged a left hemisphere network previously implicated in speech production. A contrast of silent articulation with imagined speech revealed greater activation for articulated speech in inferior frontal cortex, premotor cortex and the insula in the left hemisphere, consistent with greater articulatory load. Although both conditions were silent, this contrast also produced significantly greater activation in auditory cortex in dorsal superior temporal gyrus in both hemispheres. We suggest that these activations reflect forward predictions arising from additional levels of the perceptual/motor hierarchy that are involved in monitoring the intended speech output.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 22%
Researcher 27 22%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 29 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 30 24%
Psychology 23 18%
Linguistics 9 7%
Computer Science 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 41 33%