↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of nucleotide and haplotype diversity at ICAM-1 across global human populations with varying levels of malaria exposure

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Patterns of nucleotide and haplotype diversity at ICAM-1 across global human populations with varying levels of malaria exposure
Published in
Human Genetics, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00439-013-1284-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felicia Gomez, Gil Tomas, Wen-Ya Ko, Alessia Ranciaro, Alain Froment, Muntaser Ibrahim, Godfrey Lema, Thomas B. Nyambo, Sabah A. Omar, Charles Wambebe, Jibril B. Hirbo, Jorge Rocha, Sarah A. Tishkoff

Abstract

Malaria is one of the strongest selective pressures in recent human evolution. African populations have been and continue to be at risk for malarial infections. However, few studies have re-sequenced malaria susceptibility loci across geographically and genetically diverse groups in Africa. We examined nucleotide diversity at Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), a malaria susceptibility candidate locus, in a number of human populations with a specific focus on diverse African ethnic groups. We used tests of neutrality to assess whether natural selection has impacted this locus and tested whether SNP variation at ICAM-1 is correlated with malaria endemicity. We observe differing patterns of nucleotide and haplotype variation in global populations and higher levels of diversity in Africa. Although we do not observe a deviation from neutrality based on the allele frequency distribution, we do observe several alleles at ICAM-1, including the ICAM-1 (Kilifi) allele, that are correlated with malaria endemicity. We show that the ICAM-1 (Kilifi) allele, which is common in Africa and Asia, exists on distinct haplotype backgrounds and is likely to have arisen more recently in Asia. Our results suggest that correlation analyses of allele frequencies and malaria endemicity may be useful for identifying candidate functional variants that play a role in malaria resistance and susceptibility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 5%
Brazil 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Sri Lanka 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 35 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Librarian 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 11 27%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Computer Science 3 7%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#15,881,780
of 25,134,448 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#2,544
of 3,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,756
of 200,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,134,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.