| Title |
Seeing SPIOs Directly In Vivo with Magnetic Particle Imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Imaging and Biology, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11307-017-1081-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bo Zheng, Elaine Yu, Ryan Orendorff, Kuan Lu, Justin J Konkle, Zhi Wei Tay, Daniel Hensley, Xinyi Y Zhou, Prashant Chandrasekharan, Emine U Saritas, Patrick W Goodwill, John D Hazle, Steven M Conolly |
| Abstract |
Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) is a new molecular imaging technique that directly images superparamagnetic tracers with high image contrast and sensitivity approaching nuclear medicine techniques-but without ionizing radiation. Since its inception, the MPI research field has quickly progressed in imaging theory, hardware, tracer design, and biomedical applications. Here, we describe the history and field of MPI, outline pressing challenges to MPI technology and clinical translation, highlight unique applications in MPI, and describe the role of the WMIS MPI Interest Group in collaboratively advancing MPI as a molecular imaging technique. We invite interested investigators to join the MPI Interest Group and contribute new insights and innovations to the MPI field. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Hungary | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2017.
All research outputs
#14,539,224
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Imaging and Biology
#443
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,602
of 324,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Imaging and Biology
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.