↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Feature extraction and ML techniques for static gesture recognition

Overview of attention for article published in Neural Computing and Applications, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Feature extraction and ML techniques for static gesture recognition
Published in
Neural Computing and Applications, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00521-013-1540-6
Authors

Haitham Badi, Sabah Hasan Hussein, Sameem Abdul Kareem

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Master 3 17%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 10 56%
Engineering 6 33%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2017.
All research outputs
#6,191,652
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Neural Computing and Applications
#115
of 2,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,791
of 310,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neural Computing and Applications
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,407 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them