↓ Skip to main content

What Makes an Effective Representation of Information: A Formal Account of Observational Advantages

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Logic, Language and Information, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
What Makes an Effective Representation of Information: A Formal Account of Observational Advantages
Published in
Journal of Logic, Language and Information, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10849-017-9250-6
Authors

Gem Stapleton, Mateja Jamnik, Atsushi Shimojima

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 38%
Philosophy 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2017.
All research outputs
#19,400,321
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Logic, Language and Information
#141
of 170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,952
of 312,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Logic, Language and Information
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 170 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.