↓ Skip to main content

Safety and efficacy of treatment with asfotase alfa in patients with hypophosphatasia: Results from a Japanese clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Endocrinology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
16 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety and efficacy of treatment with asfotase alfa in patients with hypophosphatasia: Results from a Japanese clinical trial
Published in
Clinical Endocrinology, May 2017
DOI 10.1111/cen.13343
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taichi Kitaoka, Toshihiro Tajima, Keisuke Nagasaki, Toru Kikuchi, Katsusuke Yamamoto, Toshimi Michigami, Satoshi Okada, Ikuma Fujiwara, Masayuki Kokaji, Hiroshi Mochizuki, Tsutomu Ogata, Koji Tatebayashi, Atsushi Watanabe, Shuichi Yatsuga, Takuo Kubota, Keiichi Ozono

Abstract

Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is a rare skeletal disease characterized by hypomineralization and low alkaline phosphatase activity. Asfotase alfa (AA) has been recently developed to treat HPP complications. This study evaluated its safety and efficacy in Japan. Open-label, multicenter, prospective trial. Patients were enrolled in 11 hospitals from June 2014 to July 2015. Thirteen patients (9 females, 4 males) ages 0 days to 34 years at baseline were enrolled and treated with AA (2 mg/kg three times weekly subcutaneously in all but one patient). All had ALPL gene mutations. HPP forms were perinatal (n = 6), infantile (n = 5), childhood (n = 1), and adult (n = 1). Safety determined from adverse events (AEs) and laboratory data was the primary outcome measure. Efficacy was assessed as a secondary outcome measure from overall survival, respiratory status, rickets severity, and gross motor development. Injection site reactions were the most frequent AEs. Serious AEs possibly related to treatment were convulsion and hypocalcemia observed in a patient with the perinatal form. In addition, hypercalcemia and/or hyperphosphatemia was observed in three patients with the infantile form and a low-calcium and/or low-phosphate formula was given to these patients. With respect to efficacy, all patients survived and the radiographic findings, developmental milestones, and respiratory function improved. AA therapy improved skeletal, respiratory, and physical symptoms with a few serious AEs in patients with HPP. Our results add support to the safety and efficacy of AA therapy for HPP patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 12%
Student > Master 11 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 28 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 29 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,691,242
of 24,484,013 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Endocrinology
#745
of 2,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,615
of 315,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Endocrinology
#9
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,484,013 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.