↓ Skip to main content

The metagenomics worldwide research

Overview of attention for article published in Current Genetics, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
Title
The metagenomics worldwide research
Published in
Current Genetics, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00294-017-0693-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose Antonio Garrido-Cardenas, Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro

Abstract

Metagenomics is the technique, or set of techniques, whose main objective is to determine the microbial population that can be found in a determined environment, studied in the context of its community. For this, it uses the techniques of massive sequencing, or next generation sequencing, due to the difficulties presented by traditional techniques when trying to transfer all the microorganisms present in a given environment to the laboratory. Metagenomics is a newly created technique, which was born at the beginning of the twenty-first century, and since then the interest of the world scientific community in fields as diverse as medicine, biotechnology, agriculture or genetics has not left to grow. In this article, the authors make a historical review of the metagenomics, analyze and evaluate the different massive sequencing platforms used for metagenomic assays, review the current literature on this subject and advance future problems with which researchers who decide to go deeper in this field could find. In this way, the prior knowledge of the researcher will facilitate the approach of his research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 200 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 18%
Student > Master 28 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 13%
Researcher 21 10%
Other 10 5%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 48 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 5%
Environmental Science 7 3%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 53 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2017.
All research outputs
#14,390,939
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Current Genetics
#786
of 1,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,313
of 311,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Genetics
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,209 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.