| Title |
Effects of parasitic mites and protozoa on the flower constancy and foraging rate of bumble bees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, May 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00265-005-0945-3 |
| Authors |
Michael C. Otterstatter, Robert J. Gegear, Sheila R. Colla, James D. Thomson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 170 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 25% |
| Researcher | 31 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 112 | 61% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,465,367
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#651
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,444
of 59,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.