↓ Skip to main content

Relationship between landslide size and rainfall conditions in Taiwan

Overview of attention for article published in Landslides, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Relationship between landslide size and rainfall conditions in Taiwan
Published in
Landslides, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10346-016-0790-7
Authors

Chi-Wen Chen, Takashi Oguchi, Yuichi S. Hayakawa, Hitoshi Saito, Hongey Chen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 33%
Engineering 11 18%
Environmental Science 8 13%
Computer Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 18 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2017.
All research outputs
#20,413,129
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Landslides
#466
of 523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#354,933
of 420,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landslides
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.