↓ Skip to main content

Hunger and Satiety Mechanisms and Their Potential Exploitation in the Regulation of Food Intake

Overview of attention for article published in Current Obesity Reports, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 424)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
426 Mendeley
Title
Hunger and Satiety Mechanisms and Their Potential Exploitation in the Regulation of Food Intake
Published in
Current Obesity Reports, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13679-015-0184-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tehmina Amin, Julian G. Mercer

Abstract

Effective strategies to combat recent rises in obesity levels are limited. The accumulation of excess body fat results when energy intake exceeds that expended. Energy balance is controlled by hypothalamic responses, but these can be overridden by hedonic/reward brain systems. This override, combined with unprecedented availability of cheap, energy-dense, palatable foods, may partly explain the increase in overweight and obesity. The complexity of the processes that regulate feeding behaviour has driven the need for further fundamental research. Full4Health is an EU-funded project conceived to advance our understanding of hunger and satiety mechanisms. Food intake has an impact on and is also affected by the gut-brain signalling which controls hunger and appetite. This review describes selected recent research from Full4Health and how new mechanistic findings could be exploited to adapt and control our physiological responses to food, potentially providing an alternative solution to addressing the global problems related to positive energy balance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 426 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 423 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 81 19%
Student > Master 65 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 10%
Student > Postgraduate 21 5%
Researcher 20 5%
Other 49 12%
Unknown 147 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 9%
Psychology 17 4%
Other 64 15%
Unknown 155 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#420,289
of 25,550,333 outputs
Outputs from Current Obesity Reports
#35
of 424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,304
of 403,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Obesity Reports
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,550,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.