↓ Skip to main content

High pitch third generation dual-source CT: Coronary and cardiac visualization on routine chest CT

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High pitch third generation dual-source CT: Coronary and cardiac visualization on routine chest CT
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.03.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veit Sandfort, Mark A. Ahlman, Elizabeth C. Jones, Mariana Selwaness, Marcus Y. Chen, Les R. Folio, David A. Bluemke

Abstract

Chest CT scans are frequently performed in radiology departments but have not previously contained detailed depiction of cardiac structures. To evaluate myocardial and coronary visualization on high-pitch non-gated CT of the chest using 3rd generation dual-source computed tomography (CT). Cardiac anatomy of patients who had 3rd generation, non-gated high pitch contrast enhanced chest CT and who also had prior conventional (low pitch) chest CT as part of a chest abdomen pelvis exam was evaluated. Cardiac image features were scored by reviewers blinded to diagnosis and pitch. Paired analysis was performed. 3862 coronary segments and 2220 cardiac structures were evaluated by two readers in 222 CT scans. Most patients (97.2%) had chest CT for oncologic evaluation. The median pitch was 2.34 (IQR 2.05, 2.65) in high pitch and 0.8 (IQR 0.8, 0.8) in low pitch scans (p < 0.001). High pitch CT showed higher image visualization scores for all cardiovascular structures compared with conventional pitch scans (p < 0.0001). Coronary arteries were visualized in 9 coronary segments per exam in high pitch scans versus 2 segments for conventional pitch (p < 0.0001). Radiation exposure was lower in the high pitch group compared with the conventional pitch group (median CTDIvol 10.83 vs. 12.36 mGy and DLP 790 vs. 827 mGycm respectively, p < 0.01 for both) with comparable image noise (p = 0.43). Myocardial structure and coronary arteries are frequently visualized on non-gated 3rd generation chest CT. These results raise the question of whether the heart and coronary arteries should be routinely interpreted on routine chest CT that is otherwise obtained for non-cardiac indications.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Other 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 17 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Engineering 3 7%
Physics and Astronomy 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 20 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
#780
of 917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,485
of 313,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.