↓ Skip to main content

Habitat modelling of crabeater seals (Lobodon carcinophaga) in the Weddell Sea using the multivariate approach Maxent

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Habitat modelling of crabeater seals (Lobodon carcinophaga) in the Weddell Sea using the multivariate approach Maxent
Published in
Polar Biology, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00300-016-2020-0
Authors

Dominik A. Nachtsheim, Kerstin Jerosch, Wilhelm Hagen, Joachim Plötz, Horst Bornemann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 17 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 43%
Environmental Science 14 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Materials Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2023.
All research outputs
#17,345,186
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#1,444
of 1,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,008
of 388,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.