↓ Skip to main content

Morning Glory Disc Anomaly: Characteristic MR Imaging Findings

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Morning Glory Disc Anomaly: Characteristic MR Imaging Findings
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, May 2013
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a3542
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Ellika, C.D. Robson, G. Heidary, M.J. Paldino

Abstract

Establishing the diagnosis of morning glory disc anomaly is crucial to appropriate patient treatment. Although typically made clinically, the diagnosis is not always straightforward, especially in circumstances where physical examination is limited. The goal of this study was to define the spectrum and frequency of orbital findings in a series of patients with funduscopically-confirmed morning glory disc anomaly by using MR imaging. MR imaging demonstrated 3 findings in all patients: 1) funnel-shaped morphologic pattern of the posterior optic disc with elevation of the adjacent retinal surface; 2) abnormal tissue associated with the distal intraorbital segment of the ipsilateral optic nerve, with effacement of the regional subarachnoid spaces; and 3) discontinuity of the uveoscleral coat. These findings were not observed in any of the unaffected globes of the study patients. In summary, these consistent and characteristic findings of morning glory disc anomaly should allow for accurate differentiation from other ocular anomalies and have the potential to guide appropriate management of this patient population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 17%
Other 7 15%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 60%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,249,957
of 24,742,536 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#735
of 5,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,640
of 197,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#7
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,742,536 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.