↓ Skip to main content

Changes in Liver Antioxidant Status of Offspring Mice Induced by Maternal Fluoride Exposure During Gestation and Lactation

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Trace Element Research, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Changes in Liver Antioxidant Status of Offspring Mice Induced by Maternal Fluoride Exposure During Gestation and Lactation
Published in
Biological Trace Element Research, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12011-015-0573-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruiyan Niu, Haijun Han, Yuliang Zhang, Jinming Wang, Jianhai Zhang, Wei Yin, Xiufang Yin, Zilong Sun, Jundong Wang

Abstract

Excessive fluoride intake for a long time has been demonstrated to provoke hepatic oxidative stress in adults. However, the response to fluoride toxicity of liver in newborns exposed to fluoride during embryonic and suckling stages remains unclear. In this study, female Kunming mice were administrated with 25, 50, and 100 mg/L sodium fluoride (NaF) from prenatal day 0 to day 21 after delivery, and the antioxidative status in the liver of their pups at postnatal day 21 was evaluated. The results showed that compared with the control group, NaF significantly increased malondialdehyde (MDA) level and reduced catalase (CAT) activity, while no statistical difference was observed in activities and mRNA expressions of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and glutathione reductase (GR). Notably, with comparison to the controls, the protein level of CAT was significantly reduced in medium- and high-fluoride groups, while its relative mRNA abundance was enhanced which could result from the encouragement of the lowered CAT protein expression. These findings suggested that CAT was more susceptible to low-fluoride exposure in early life.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 10 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2017.
All research outputs
#17,886,132
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Biological Trace Element Research
#1,257
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,291
of 388,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Trace Element Research
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.