You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Detection of quantitative trait loci in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle using genome-wide association studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genetics Selection Evolution, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1297-9686-45-43 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sunduimijid Bolormaa, Jennie E Pryce, Kathryn E Kemper, Ben J Hayes, Yuandan Zhang, Bruce Tier, William Barendse, Antonio Reverter, Mike E Goddard |
Abstract |
The apparent effect of a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) on phenotype depends on the linkage disequilibrium (LD) between the SNP and a quantitative trait locus (QTL). However, the phase of LD between a SNP and a QTL may differ between Bos indicus and Bos taurus because they diverged at least one hundred thousand years ago. Here, we test the hypothesis that the apparent effect of a SNP on a quantitative trait depends on whether the SNP allele is inherited from a Bos taurus or Bos indicus ancestor. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 3% |
Uganda | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 94 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 23% |
Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 11% |
Lecturer | 3 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Unknown | 15 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 55% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 13% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#550
of 822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,987
of 225,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 822 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.