↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Cadmium Ion on alpha-Glucosidase: An Inhibition Kinetics and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Integration Study

Overview of attention for article published in The Protein Journal, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Effect of Cadmium Ion on alpha-Glucosidase: An Inhibition Kinetics and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Integration Study
Published in
The Protein Journal, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10930-016-9664-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tao Luo, Jinhyuk Lee, Zhi-Rong Lü, Hang Mu, Li-Mei Yue, Yong-Doo Park, Zhuo-Ming Ye

Abstract

α-Glucosidase is a critical metabolic enzyme that produces glucose molecules by catalyzing carbohydrates. The aim of this study is to elucidate biological toxicity of Cd(2+) based on α-glucosidase activity and conformational changes. We studied Cd(2+)-mediated inactivation as well as conformational modulation of α-glucosidase by using kinetics coupled with simulation of molecular dynamics. The enzyme was significantly inactivated by Cd(2+) in a reversibly binding behavior, and Cd(2+) binding induced a non-competitive type of inhibition reaction (the K i was calculated as 0.3863 ± 0.033 mM). Cd(2+) also modulated regional denaturation of the active site pocket as well as overall partial tertiary structural change. In computational simulations using molecular dynamics, simulated introduction of Cd(2+) induced in a depletion of secondary structure by docking Cd(2+) near the saccharides degradation at the active site, suggesting that Cd(2+) modulating enzyme denaturation. The present study elucidated that the binding of Cd(2+) triggers conformational changes of α-glucosidase as well as inactivates catalytic function, and thus suggests an explanation of the deleterious effects of Cd(2+) on α-glucosidase.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 14%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Protein Journal
#475
of 639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,562
of 312,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Protein Journal
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 639 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.