↓ Skip to main content

Neural responses to subliminally presented cannabis and other emotionally evocative cues in cannabis-dependent individuals

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Neural responses to subliminally presented cannabis and other emotionally evocative cues in cannabis-dependent individuals
Published in
Psychopharmacology, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00213-013-3342-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reagan R. Wetherill, Anna Rose Childress, Kanchana Jagannathan, Julian Bender, Kimberly A. Young, Jesse J. Suh, Charles P. O’Brien, Teresa R. Franklin

Abstract

Addiction theories posit that drug-related cues maintain and contribute to drug use and relapse. Indeed, our recent study in cocaine-dependent patients demonstrated that subliminally presented cocaine-related stimuli activate reward neurocircuitry without being consciously perceived. Activation of reward neurocircuitry may provoke craving and perhaps prime an individual for subsequent drug-seeking behaviors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 108 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 23%
Neuroscience 19 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 33 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,807,740
of 23,957,285 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#1,214
of 5,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,393
of 217,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#12
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,957,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.