You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison of physical and psychological features of responders and non-responders to cervical facet blocks in chronic whiplash
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-313 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashley Dean Smith, Gwendolen Jull, Geoff Schneider, Bevan Frizzell, Robert Allen Hooper, Michele Sterling |
| Abstract |
Cervical facet block (FB) procedures are often used as a diagnostic precursor to radiofrequency neurotomies (RFN) in the management of chronic whiplash associated disorders (WAD). Some individuals will respond to the FB procedures and others will not respond. Such responders and non-responders provided a sample of convenience to question whether there were differences in their physical and psychological features. This information may inform future predictive studies and ultimately the clinical selection of patients for FB procedures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 31 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 16% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 33 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2015.
All research outputs
#15,284,663
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,446
of 4,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,952
of 214,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#52
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.