You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A simple protocol to obtain highly pure Wolbachia endosymbiont DNA for genome sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Microbiological Methods, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iñaki Iturbe-Ormaetxe, Megan Woolfit, Edwige Rancès, Anne Duplouy, Scott L. O'Neill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Madagascar | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Microbiological Methods
#1,480
of 2,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,806
of 109,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Microbiological Methods
#17
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.