↓ Skip to main content

Warm-Up and Performance in Competitive Swimming

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
Title
Warm-Up and Performance in Competitive Swimming
Published in
Sports Medicine, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40279-013-0117-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henrique P. Neiva, Mário C. Marques, Tiago M. Barbosa, Mikel Izquierdo, Daniel A. Marinho

Abstract

Warm-up before physical activity is commonly accepted to be fundamental, and any priming practices are usually thought to optimize performance. However, specifically in swimming, studies on the effects of warm-up are scarce, which may be due to the swimming pool environment, which has a high temperature and humidity, and to the complexity of warm-up procedures. The purpose of this study is to review and summarize the different studies on how warming up affects swimming performance, and to develop recommendations for improving the efficiency of warm-up before competition. Most of the main proposed effects of warm-up, such as elevated core and muscular temperatures, increased blood flow and oxygen delivery to muscle cells and higher efficiency of muscle contractions, support the hypothesis that warm-up enhances performance. However, while many researchers have reported improvements in performance after warm-up, others have found no benefits to warm-up. This lack of consensus emphasizes the need to evaluate the real effects of warm-up and optimize its design. Little is known about the effectiveness of warm-up in competitive swimming, and the variety of warm-up methods and swimming events studied makes it difficult to compare the published conclusions about the role of warm-up in swimming. Recent findings have shown that warm-up has a positive effect on the swimmer's performance, especially for distances greater than 200 m. We recommend that swimmers warm-up for a relatively moderate distance (between 1,000 and 1,500 m) with a proper intensity (a brief approach to race pace velocity) and recovery time sufficient to prevent the early onset of fatigue and to allow the restoration of energy reserves (8-20 min).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 329 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 58 17%
Student > Master 49 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 10%
Researcher 19 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 52 15%
Unknown 111 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 136 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 117 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2014.
All research outputs
#5,696,813
of 23,398,349 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,898
of 2,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,391
of 215,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#25
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,398,349 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.