↓ Skip to main content

Phylogenetic and phylogeographic relationships in Ixodes holocyclus and Ixodes cornuatus (Acari: Ixodidae) inferred from COX1 and ITS2 sequences

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Parasitology, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phylogenetic and phylogeographic relationships in Ixodes holocyclus and Ixodes cornuatus (Acari: Ixodidae) inferred from COX1 and ITS2 sequences
Published in
International Journal for Parasitology, April 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.03.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Song, Renfu Shao, Rick Atwell, Stephen Barker, Dianne Vankan

Abstract

We inferred the phylogenetic and phylogeographic relationships in ticks, which were identified morphologically as Ixodes holocyclus and Ixodes cornuatus, from mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COX1) and nuclear internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) sequences. We obtained COX1 (640bp) and ITS2 (527-568bp) sequences from 429 ticks from 49 localities in Tasmania, Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland, Australia. Our analyses show that there are two species of Ixodes in eastern Australia that cause paralysis in dogs and other mammals: I. holocyclus and I. cornuatus. Further, we conclude that the morphological criteria used to differentiate female I. holocyclus and I. cornuatus are equivocal but I. holocyclus can be distinguished from I. cornuatus using COX1 and/or ITS2 sequences. Intraspecific genetic variation in I. holocyclus and I. cornuatus was less than 0.86% and 0.19% for COX1 and ITS2, respectively. Ixodes holocyclus could be genetically distinguished between different geographic ranges. There were no significant genetic differences between I.cornuatus from Tasmania and mainland Australia, but there are some COX1 haplotypes of I. cornuatus from the mainland that were not detected in Tasmanian and vice versa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 64 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 23%
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Master 13 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 6 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Parasitology
#1,877
of 2,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,024
of 119,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Parasitology
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.