↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cells in upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Oncology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cells in upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Published in
Medical Oncology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12032-017-0941-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bo Zhang, Wei Yu, Xueru Feng, Zheng Zhao, Yu Fan, Yisen Meng, Shuai Hu, Yun Cui, Qun He, Hong Zhang, Dong Li, Zhisong He, Liqun Zhou, Jie Jin, Wenke Han

Abstract

Immunotherapy targeting the programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor/PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) pathway has shown promising results in several malignancies. However, the prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression remains unknown in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). This study aimed to evaluate PD-L1 expression and its association with clinicopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes in UTUC patients. PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cells (TIMCs), and E-cadherin and N-cadherin expression on tumor cells were assessed by immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 162 patients with UTUC. Associations of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and TIMCs with clinicopathological characteristics and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were evaluated. Out of 162 patients, 20 (12.3%) and 35 (21.6%) had positive PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and TIMCs, respectively. Decreased E-cadherin expression was associated with PD-L1 positivity on tumor cells (P = 0.048) and PD-L1 negativity on TIMCs (P = 0.033). PD-L1 expression on tumor cells was higher in patients with preoperative chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4-5 than in those with no CKD or CKD stage 1-3 (P = 0.011). PD-L1 was differentially expressed in tumor cells and TIMCs in UTUC. Multivariate analyses revealed that PD-L1 expression on tumor cells independently predicted shorter CSS (P = 0.012), whereas PD-L1 expression on TIMCs independently predicted longer CSS (P = 0.034).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2017.
All research outputs
#20,413,129
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Medical Oncology
#966
of 1,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,123
of 310,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Oncology
#27
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,301 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.