| Title |
Pharmaceutical Pricing: An Empirical Study of Market Competition in Chinese Hospitals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PharmacoEconomics, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40273-013-0099-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jing Wu, Judy Xu, Gordon Liu, Jiuhong Wu |
| Abstract |
High pharmaceutical prices and over-prescribing of high-priced pharmaceuticals in Chinese hospitals has long been criticized. Although policy makers have tried to address these issues, they have not yet found an effective balance between government regulation and market forces. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
| Researcher | 9 | 20% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 24% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,191,499
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#812
of 1,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,617
of 215,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.