↓ Skip to main content

Fluorine-18 Labeling of the HER2-Targeting Single-Domain Antibody 2Rs15d Using a Residualizing Label and Preclinical Evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Imaging and Biology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Fluorine-18 Labeling of the HER2-Targeting Single-Domain Antibody 2Rs15d Using a Residualizing Label and Preclinical Evaluation
Published in
Molecular Imaging and Biology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11307-017-1082-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhengyuan Zhou, Ganesan Vaidyanathan, Darryl McDougald, Choong Mo Kang, Irina Balyasnikova, Nick Devoogdt, Angeline N. Ta, Brian R. McNaughton, Michael R. Zalutsky

Abstract

Our previous studies with F-18-labeled anti-HER2 single-domain antibodies (sdAbs) utilized 5F7, which binds to the same epitope on HER2 as trastuzumab, complicating its use for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of patients undergoing trastuzumab therapy. On the other hand, sdAb 2Rs15d binds to a different epitope on HER2 and thus might be a preferable vector for imaging in these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tumor targeting of F-18 -labeled 2Rs15d in HER2-expressing breast carcinoma cells and xenografts. sdAb 2Rs15d was labeled with the residualizing labels N-succinimidyl 3-((4-(4-[(18)F]fluorobutyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)methyl)-5-(guanidinomethyl)benzoate ([(18)F]RL-I) and N-succinimidyl 4-guanidinomethyl-3-[(125)I]iodobenzoate ([(125)I]SGMIB), and the purity and HER2-specific binding affinity and immunoreactivity were assessed after labeling. The biodistribution of I-125- and F-18-labeled 2Rs15d was determined in SCID mice bearing subcutaneous BT474M1 xenografts. MicroPET/x-ray computed tomograph (CT) imaging of [(18)F]RL-I-2Rs15d was performed in this model and compared to that of nonspecific sdAb [(18)F]RL-I-R3B23. MicroPET/CT imaging was also done in an intracranial HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis model after administration of 2Rs15d-, 5F7-, and R3B23-[(18)F]RL-I conjugates. [(18)F]RL-I was conjugated to 2Rs15d in 40.8 ± 9.1 % yield and with a radiochemical purity of 97-100 %. Its immunoreactive fraction (IRF) and affinity for HER2-specific binding were 79.2 ± 5.4 % and 7.1 ± 0.4 nM, respectively. [(125)I]SGMIB was conjugated to 2Rs15d in 58.4 ± 8.2 % yield and with a radiochemical purity of 95-99 %; its IRF and affinity for HER2-specific binding were 79.0 ± 12.9 % and 4.5 ± 0.8 nM, respectively. Internalized radioactivity in BT474M1 cells in vitro for [(18)F]RL-I-2Rs15d was 43.7 ± 3.6, 36.5 ± 2.6, and 21.7 ± 1.2 % of initially bound radioactivity at 1, 2, and 4 h, respectively, and was similar to that seen for [(125)I]SGMIB-2Rs15d. Uptake of [(18)F]RL-I-2Rs15d in subcutaneous xenografts was 16-20 %ID/g over 1-3 h. Subcutaneous tumor could be clearly delineated by microPET/CT imaging with [(18)F]RL-I-2Rs15d but not with [(18)F]RL-I-R3B23. Intracranial breast cancer brain metastases could be visualized after intravenous administration of both [(18)F]RL-I-2Rs15d and [(18)F]RL-I-5F7. Although radiolabeled 2Rs15d conjugates exhibited lower tumor cell retention both in vitro and in vivo than that observed previously for 5F7, given that it binds to a different epitope on HER2 from those targeted by the clinically utilized HER2-targeted therapeutic antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab, F-18-labeled 2Rs15d has potential for assessing HER2 status by PET imaging after trastuzumab and/or pertuzumab therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 9%
Chemistry 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,264,793
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Imaging and Biology
#228
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,232
of 324,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Imaging and Biology
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.