↓ Skip to main content

Electrochemical transduction of DNA hybridization at modified electrodes by using an electroactive pyridoacridone intercalator

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Electrochemical transduction of DNA hybridization at modified electrodes by using an electroactive pyridoacridone intercalator
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00216-013-7314-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurent Bouffier, Bingquan Stuart Wang, André Roget, Thierry Livache, Martine Demeunynck, Pascal Mailley

Abstract

A synthetic redox probe structurally related to natural pyridoacridones was designed and electrochemically characterised. These heterocycles behave as DNA intercalators due to their extended planar structure that promotes stacking in between nucleic acid base pairs. Electrochemical characterization by cyclic voltammetry revealed a quasi-reversible electrochemical behaviour occurring at a mild negative potential in aqueous solution. The study of the mechanism showed that the iminoquinone redox moiety acts similarly to quinone involving a two-electron reduction coupled with proton transfer. The easily accessible potential region with respect to aqueous electro-inactive window makes the pyridoacridone ring suitable for the indirect electrochemical detection of chemically unlabelled DNA. Its usefulness as electrochemical hybridization indicator was assessed on immobilised DNA and compared to doxorubicin. The voltamperometric response of the intercalator acts as an indicator of the presence of double-stranded DNA at the electrode surface and allows the selective transduction of immobilised oligonucleotide hybridization at both macro- and microscale electrodes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Professor 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Materials Science 1 8%
Chemical Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#5,669
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,266
of 210,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#38
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.