↓ Skip to main content

Probable Gastrointestinal Toxicity of Kombucha Tea

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Probable Gastrointestinal Toxicity of Kombucha Tea
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2002
DOI 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07127.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Radhika Srinivasan, Susan Smolinske, PharmD, David Greenbaum

Abstract

Kombucha tea is a health beverage made by incubating the Kombucha "mushroom" in tea and sugar. Although therapeutic benefits have been attributed to the drink, neither its beneficial effects nor adverse side effects have been reported widely in the scientific literature. Side effects probably related to consumption of Kombucha tea are reported in four patients. Two presented with symptoms of allergic reaction, the third with jaundice, and the fourth with nausea, vomiting, and head and neck pain. In all four, use of Kombucha tea in proximity to onset of symptoms and symptom resolution on cessation of tea drinking suggest a probable etiologic association.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 18%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Master 11 9%
Other 6 5%
Professor 5 4%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 40 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Chemical Engineering 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 46 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#519,488
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#405
of 8,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#314
of 49,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.