↓ Skip to main content

Cerasi Japonicæ duæ Species novæ

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Plant Research, January 1901
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cerasi Japonicæ duæ Species novæ
Published in
Journal of Plant Research, January 1901
DOI 10.15281/jplantres1887.15.174_99
Authors

J Matsumura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Research
#203
of 1,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64
of 2,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them