↓ Skip to main content

Automatic classification of sentences to support Evidence Based Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automatic classification of sentences to support Evidence Based Medicine
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-12-s2-s5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Su Nam Kim, David Martinez, Lawrence Cavedon, Lars Yencken

Abstract

Given a set of pre-defined medical categories used in Evidence Based Medicine, we aim to automatically annotate sentences in medical abstracts with these labels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 4%
United States 3 3%
India 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 81 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 23%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 37 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 17%
Engineering 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Linguistics 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,353,475
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,300
of 7,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,410
of 108,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#34
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.