↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of Resistance Training on Distance Running Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
10 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
492 Mendeley
Title
The Impact of Resistance Training on Distance Running Performance
Published in
Sports Medicine, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200333070-00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan P. Jung

Abstract

Traditionally, distance running performance was thought to be determined by several characteristics, including maximum oxygen consumption (VO(2max)), lactate threshold (LT), and running economy. Improvements in these areas are primarily achieved through endurance training. Recently, however, it has been shown that anaerobic factors may also play an important role in distance running performance. As a result, some researchers have theorised that resistance training may benefit distance runners. Because resistance training is unlikely to elicit an aerobic stimulus of greater than 50% of VO(2max), it is unlikely that resistance training would improve VO(2max) in trained distance runners. However, it appears that VO(2max) is not compromised when resistance training is added to an endurance programme. Similarly, LT is likely not improved as a result of resistance training in trained endurance runners; however, improvements in LT have been observed in untrained individuals as a result of resistance training. Trained distance runners have shown improvements of up to 8% in running economy following a period of resistance training. Even a small improvement in running economy could have a large impact on distance running performance, particularly in longer events, such as marathons or ultra-marathons. The improvement in running economy has been theorised to be a result of improvements in neuromuscular characteristics, including motor unit recruitment and reduced ground contact time. Although largely theoretical at this point, if resistance training is to improve distance running performance, it will likely have the largest impact on anaerobic capacity and/or neuromuscular characteristics. The primary purpose of this review is to consider the impact of resistance training on the factors that are known to impact distance running performance. A second purpose is to consider different modes of resistance exercise to determine if an optimal protocol exists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 492 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 9 2%
United States 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 462 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 20%
Student > Bachelor 66 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 10%
Researcher 40 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 7%
Other 123 25%
Unknown 79 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 252 51%
Medicine and Dentistry 51 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Other 43 9%
Unknown 91 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,059,528
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#913
of 2,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,989
of 190,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#107
of 762 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 762 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.