↓ Skip to main content

Natural hybridization among wild, weedy and cultivated Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.

Overview of attention for article published in Euphytica, November 1975
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Natural hybridization among wild, weedy and cultivated Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.
Published in
Euphytica, November 1975
DOI 10.1007/bf00132908
Authors

Kanti M. Rawal

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,524,541
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#326
of 1,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,203
of 5,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.