↓ Skip to main content

Remembering the best and worst of times: Memories for extreme outcomes bias risky decisions

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Remembering the best and worst of times: Memories for extreme outcomes bias risky decisions
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, November 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13423-013-0542-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher R. Madan, Elliot A. Ludvig, Marcia L. Spetch

Abstract

When making decisions on the basis of past experiences, people must rely on their memories. Human memory has many well-known biases, including the tendency to better remember highly salient events. We propose an extreme-outcome rule, whereby this memory bias leads people to overweight the largest gains and largest losses, leading to more risk seeking for relative gains than for relative losses. To test this rule, in two experiments, people repeatedly chose between fixed and risky options, where the risky option led equiprobably to more or less than did the fixed option. As was predicted, people were more risk seeking for relative gains than for relative losses. In subsequent memory tests, people tended to recall the extreme outcome first and also judged the extreme outcome as having occurred more frequently. Across individuals, risk preferences in the risky-choice task correlated with these memory biases. This extreme-outcome rule presents a novel mechanism through which memory influences decision making.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 2%
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Switzerland 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 122 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 28%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 15 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 66 49%
Neuroscience 15 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 7%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 22 16%