↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating corruption under the application of the SOCIO-economic development desgrowth index (Ð-index): the case of Guatemala

Overview of attention for article published in Quality & Quantity, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating corruption under the application of the SOCIO-economic development desgrowth index (Ð-index): the case of Guatemala
Published in
Quality & Quantity, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11135-017-0508-5
Authors

Mario Arturo Ruiz Estrada, Marcin Waldemar Staniewski, Ibrahim Ndoma

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 29%
Student > Master 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 29%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2017.
All research outputs
#15,453,139
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Quality & Quantity
#365
of 610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,673
of 310,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality & Quantity
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 610 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.