| Title |
Cemented versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures: 5-year Followup of a Randomized Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-013-3308-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ellen Langslet, Frede Frihagen, Vidar Opland, Jan Erik Madsen, Lars Nordsletten, Wender Figved |
| Abstract |
Displaced femoral neck fractures usually are treated with hemiarthroplasty. However, the degree to which the design of the implant used (cemented or uncemented) affects the outcome is not known and may be therapeutically important. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Argentina | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 231 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 13% |
| Researcher | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 61 | 26% |
| Unknown | 44 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 139 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Unknown | 63 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,660,035
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#994
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,512
of 219,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#12
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.