↓ Skip to main content

Nurses’ perceptions of the factors which cause violence and aggression in the emergency department: A qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in International Emergency Nursing, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nurses’ perceptions of the factors which cause violence and aggression in the emergency department: A qualitative study
Published in
International Emergency Nursing, October 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.ienj.2013.09.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shirley Angland, Maura Dowling, Dympna Casey

Abstract

There has been an increase in violence and aggression in emergency departments (EDs) in recent years. Among professional health care workers, nurses are more likely than other staff members to be involved in aggressive incidents with patients or relatives. This research study was undertaken to determine nurses' perceptions of the factors that cause violence and aggression in the ED. Using a qualitative approach, twelve nurses working in an Irish ED were interviewed. Thematic analysis of the interview data revealed that environmental and communication factors contributed to violence and aggression in the ED. Participants perceived waiting times and lack of communication as contributing factors to aggression, and triage was the area in the ED where aggression was most likely to occur. A number of key recommendations arise from the study findings and they all relate to communication. To address the aggression that may arise from waiting times, electronic boards indicating approximate waiting times may be useful. Also, information guides and videotapes on the patient's journey through the ED may be of benefit. Consideration to the appointment of a communication officer in the ED and communication training for ED staff is also recommended.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 242 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 21%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Researcher 15 6%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 67 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 80 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 13%
Social Sciences 16 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 5%
Psychology 10 4%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 69 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2017.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Emergency Nursing
#478
of 671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,672
of 222,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Emergency Nursing
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 671 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.