Title |
Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy Does Not Affect Food Preferences When Assessed by an Ad libitum Buffet Meal
|
---|---|
Published in |
Obesity Surgery, April 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11695-017-2678-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mette S. Nielsen, Bodil J. Christensen, Christian Ritz, Simone Rasmussen, Thea T. Hansen, Wender L. P. Bredie, Carel W. le Roux, Anders Sjödin, Julie B. Schmidt |
Abstract |
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) lead to a reduction in energy intake. It is uncertain whether this reduction is simply due to eating smaller portions or if surgery changes food preferences towards less energy-dense food. Previous results rely on verbal reports, which may be prone to recall bias and underestimation of especially unhealthy foods. Using an ad libitum buffet meal targeting direct behavior, we investigated if RYGB and SG surgery leads to changes in food preferences. In addition, we assessed food preferences by a picture display test to explore differences between a method relying on verbal report and a method assessing direct behavior. Forty-one subjects (BMI 45.0 ± 6.8 kg/m(2)) completed a visit pre- and 6 months post-RYGB (n = 31) and SG (n = 10). Mean BMI decreased with 11.7 ± 0.6 kg/m(2) and total energy intake at the buffet meal with 54% (4491 ± 208 kJ vs. 2083 ± 208 kJ, P < 0.001), respectively. However, relative energy intake from the following food categories: high-fat, low-fat, sweet, savory, high-fat-savory, high-fat-sweet, low-fat-savory, and low-fat-sweet, as well as energy density did not change following surgery (all P ≥ 0.18). In contrast, the picture display test showed that food from the low-fat-savory group was chosen more often post-surgery (34 ± 8% vs. 65 ± 9%, P = 0.02). The reduction in energy intake after RYGB and SG surgery and the subsequent weight loss seems to be primarily related to a reduction in portion sizes and not by changes in food preferences towards less energy-dense foods. These results underline the necessity of investigating eating behavior by targeting direct behavior. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 88 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
Researcher | 7 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 15 | 17% |
Unknown | 32 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
Psychology | 7 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 16% |
Unknown | 36 | 40% |