↓ Skip to main content

How do thermophilic proteins deal with heat?

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, August 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
402 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
284 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
How do thermophilic proteins deal with heat?
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, August 2001
DOI 10.1007/pl00000935
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Kumar, R. Nussinov

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed an explosion of sequence and structural information for proteins from hyperthermophilic and thermophilic organisms. Complete genome sequences are available for many hyperthermophilic archaeons. Here, we review some recent studies on protein thermostability along with work from our laboratory. A large number of sequence and structural factors are thought to contribute toward higher intrinsic thermal stability of proteins from these organisms. The most consistent are surface loop deletion, increased occurrence of hydrophobic residues with branched side chains and an increased proportion of charged residues at the expense of uncharged polar residues. The energetic contribution of electrostatic interactions such as salt bridges and their networks toward protein stability can be stabilizing or destabilizing. For hyperthermophilic proteins, the contribution is mostly stabilizing. Macroscopically, improvement in electrostatic interactions and strengthening of hydrophobic cores by branched apolar residues increase the enthalpy change between the folded and unfolded states of a thermophilic protein. At the same time, surface loop deletion contributes to decreased conformational entropy and decreased heat capacity change between the folded and unfolded states of the protein.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 264 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 20%
Researcher 44 15%
Student > Master 38 13%
Student > Bachelor 38 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 52 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 72 25%
Chemistry 23 8%
Engineering 11 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 2%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 57 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,025,938
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#478
of 5,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,117
of 40,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.