| Title |
Influence of composition upon the variety of tastes in Cinnamomi Cortex
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Natural Medicines, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11418-009-0326-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naoka Yokomi, Michiho Ito |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 23% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Engineering | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,524,541
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Natural Medicines
#91
of 532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,895
of 107,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Natural Medicines
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 532 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them