↓ Skip to main content

WHO/UNEP global surveys of PCDDs, PCDFs, PCBs and DDTs in human milk and benefit–risk evaluation of breastfeeding

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
Title
WHO/UNEP global surveys of PCDDs, PCDFs, PCBs and DDTs in human milk and benefit–risk evaluation of breastfeeding
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00204-016-1802-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin van den Berg, Karin Kypke, Alexander Kotz, Angelika Tritscher, Seoung Yong Lee, Katarina Magulova, Heidelore Fiedler, Rainer Malisch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 235 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 13%
Student > Master 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 75 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 9%
Environmental Science 19 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Chemistry 16 7%
Other 48 20%
Unknown 91 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,781,916
of 23,989,683 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#114
of 2,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,992
of 369,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#6
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,989,683 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.