You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
RNAdb 2.0—an expanded database of mammalian non-coding RNAs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nucleic Acids Research, December 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1093/nar/gkl926 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ken C. Pang, Stuart Stephen, Marcel E. Dinger, Pär G. Engström, Boris Lenhard, John S. Mattick |
| Abstract |
RNAdb is a comprehensive database of mammalian non-protein-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). There is increasing recognition that ncRNAs play important regulatory roles in multicellular organisms, and there is an expanding rate of discovery of novel ncRNAs as well as an increasing allocation of function. In this update to RNAdb, we provide nucleotide sequences and annotations for tens of thousands of non-housekeeping ncRNAs, including a wide range of mammalian microRNAs, small nucleolar RNAs and larger mRNA-like ncRNAs. Some of these have documented functions and/or expression patterns, but the majority remain of unclear significance, and include PIWI-interacting RNAs, ncRNAs identified from the latest rounds of large-scale cDNA sequencing projects, putative antisense transcripts, as well as ncRNAs predicted on the basis of structural features and alignments. Improvements to the database comprise not only new and updated ncRNA datasets, but also provision of microarray-based expression data and closer interface with more specialized ncRNA resources such as miRBase and snoRNA-LBME-db. To access RNAdb, visit http://research.imb.uq.edu.au/RNAdb. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 20% |
| Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 71 | 52% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2014.
All research outputs
#4,082,166
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#6,526
of 27,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,244
of 168,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#31
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.