You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acanthamoeba, Fungal, and Bacterial Keratitis: A Comparison of Risk Factors and Clinical Features
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Ophthalmology, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeena Mascarenhas, Prajna Lalitha, N. Venkatesh Prajna, Muthiah Srinivasan, Manoranjan Das, Sean S. D'Silva, Catherine E. Oldenburg, Durga S. Borkar, Elizabeth J. Esterberg, Thomas M. Lietman, Jeremy D. Keenan |
| Abstract |
To determine risk factors and clinical signs that may differentiate between bacterial, fungal, and acanthamoeba keratitis among patients presenting with presumed infectious keratitis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 29% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 39 | 28% |
| Unknown | 24 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2014.
All research outputs
#6,313,184
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Ophthalmology
#1,169
of 6,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,877
of 228,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Ophthalmology
#14
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,477 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.