You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial of Nebulized Epinephrine in Infants with Acute Bronchiolitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, July 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa022226 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire Wainwright, Luis Altamirano, Marise Cheney, Joyce Cheney, Scott Barber, Darrell Price, Sue Moloney, Ann Kimberley, Nick Woolfield, Susan Cadzow, Frank Fiumara, Peter Wilson, Steve Mego, Dianne VandeVelde, Sharon Sanders, Peter O'Rourke, Paul Francis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 33 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 34 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,353,475
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#28,473
of 30,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,190
of 48,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#130
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 116.6. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.