↓ Skip to main content

Pathology of Human Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma Xenografts in NSG Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Endocrine Pathology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Pathology of Human Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma Xenografts in NSG Mice
Published in
Endocrine Pathology, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12022-016-9452-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

James F. Powers, Karel Pacak, Arthur S. Tischler

Abstract

A major impediment to the development of effective treatments for metastatic or unresectable pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas has been the absence of valid models for pre-clinical testing. Attempts to establish cell lines or xenografts from human pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas have previously been unsuccessful. NOD-scid gamma (NSG) mice are a recently developed strain lacking functional B-cells, T-cells, and NK cells. We report here that xenografts of primary human paragangliomas will take in NSG mice while maintaining their architectural and immunophenotypic characteristics as expressed in the patients. In contrast to grafts of cell lines and of most common types of primary tumors, the growth rate of grafted paragangliomas is very slow, accurately representing the growth rate of most pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas even in metastases in humans. Although the model is therefore technically challenging, primary patient-derived xenografts of paragangliomas in NSG mice provide a potentially valuable new tool that could prove especially valuable for testing treatments aimed at eradicating the small tumor deposits that are often numerous in patients with metastatic paraganglioma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,014,252
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Endocrine Pathology
#78
of 340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,319
of 320,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endocrine Pathology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 340 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.