↓ Skip to main content

A new mouse model of frailty: the Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase knockout mouse

Overview of attention for article published in GeroScience, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
A new mouse model of frailty: the Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase knockout mouse
Published in
GeroScience, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11357-017-9975-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sathyaseelan S. Deepa, Shylesh Bhaskaran, Sara Espinoza, Susan V. Brooks, Anne McArdle, Malcolm J. Jackson, Holly Van Remmen, Arlan Richardson

Abstract

Frailty is a geriatric syndrome that is an important public health problem for the older adults living in the USA. Although several methods have been developed to measure frailty in humans, we have very little understanding of its etiology. Because the molecular basis of frailty is poorly understood, mouse models would be of great value in determining which pathways contribute to the development of frailty. More importantly, mouse models would be critical in testing potential therapies to treat and possibly prevent frailty. In this article, we present data showing that Sod1KO mice, which lack the antioxidant enzyme, Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase, are an excellent model of frailty, and we compare the Sod1KO mice to the only other mouse model of frailty, mice with the deletion of the IL-10 gene. Sod1KO mice exhibit four characteristics that have been used to define human frailty: weight loss, weakness, low physical activity, and exhaustion. In addition, Sod1KO mice show increased inflammation and sarcopenia, which are strongly associated with human frailty. The Sod1KO mice also show alterations in pathways that have been proposed to play a role in the etiology of frailty: oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cell senescence. Using Sod1KO mice, we show that dietary restriction can delay/prevent characteristics of frailty in mice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2017.
All research outputs
#14,034,361
of 23,764,938 outputs
Outputs from GeroScience
#334
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,320
of 311,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeroScience
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,764,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them