↓ Skip to main content

Characterizing gene family evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Procedures Online, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Characterizing gene family evolution
Published in
Biological Procedures Online, June 2008
DOI 10.1251/bpo144
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A. Liberles, Katharina Dittmar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Chile 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Costa Rica 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 56 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 8 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biological Procedures Online
#74
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,633
of 96,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Procedures Online
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.